Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Sec. 302, 120-B, 201, 506 r/w. Sec. 34 —Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973— Sec. 313, 164 —Indian Evidence Act, 1872 — sec. 27—a missing complaint and subsequent allegations of conspiracy, abduction, murder, and disappearance of evidence relating to one deceased-FIR registered -no allegation of "last seen", no allegation of participation in abduction or committing murder of the deceased- no eye-witnesses, alleged that accused no. 1 is connected with the incident in question-driver of the tempo trax vehicle is the sole eye-witness —doctor who conducted the post-mortem of the dead body of the deceased, death might have been occurred 10 days ago— injunction was granted in favour of deceased and restraining the accused no.1from alienating the suit property-"compelling and substantial reasons"- guilt of the accused was proved beyond a reasonable doubt .

Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 — Sec. 3, 3(1)( i ), 3(1)(ii), 3(2), and 3(4) — Punishments for involvement in organized crime — Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Sec. 396, 307, 397, 412, 34, 302 — Dacoity with murder — Attempt to mourder — Robbery, or dacoity, with attempt to cause death or grievous hurt -Dishonestly receiving property stolen in the commission of a dacoity -Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention — Murder define— Sec. 313, 161 — CrPC, 1973- Power to examine the accused-Examination of witnesses by police— Sec. 27 — Evidence Act, 1872— How much of information received from accused may be proved— Article 136 — Constitution of India,1950— Special leave to appeal by Supreme Court— Section 147,148 — Indian Evidence Act,1872— Evidence as to matters in writing— Cross-examination as to previous statements in writing-Impugned judgments do not stand to scrutiny-Appeal allowed.

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Sec. 528 —quashing of FIR — Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Sec. 376,376(2)(n), 507 —Indian Contract Act, 1872 — u/sec. 19 —respondent No.2, lodged a complaint stating that she was married to a person ABC in the year 2019 and had a minor daughter out of the said wedlock— respondent No.2 is a welleducated lady who is married and has a minor daughter,no divorce decree passed between respondent No.2 and her husband-"armed forces" means the naval, military and air forces and includes any member of the Armed Forces constituted under any law—expression "repeatedly", more than one act of sexual assault, committed at different points in time on the same victim-relationship between the parties was cordial and also consensual in nature- promise of marriage was illusory, made in bad faith, no genuine intention of fulfilment, solely to exploit the woman.- Consent may be express or implied, coerced or misguided, obtained willingly or through deceit- false promise of marriage by the accused- relationship devoid of any coercion, fraud, or misrepresentation.